# Organizational Psychology

Canonical URL: https://shipslides.com/d/psychology-organizational-psychology
Raw viewer URL: https://content.shipslides.com/d/psychology-organizational-psychology/raw
Category: Psychology
Slides: 30
Updated: 2026-05-17T20:51:16.883Z
Tags: psychology, organizational

## Summary

The Science of Work and Human Behavior in Organizations Key sections include: Organizational Psychology; Historical Foundations; Motivation at Work; Leadership; Team Dynamics; Personnel Selection; Organizational Justice; Organizational Culture; Occupational Stress and Burnout; Organizational Change.

## Slide Outline

1. Organizational Psychology
2. Historical Foundations
3. Motivation at Work
4. Leadership
5. Team Dynamics
6. Personnel Selection
7. Organizational Justice
8. Organizational Culture
9. Occupational Stress and Burnout
10. Organizational Change
11. Performance Management
12. Diversity and Inclusion
13. Employee Engagement
14. Work Design
15. Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB)
16. Power and Politics
17. Decision Making in Organizations
18. Organizational Socialization
19. Work-Life Balance
20. Counterproductive Work Behavior
21. Positive Organizational Psychology
22. People Analytics and the Future
23. Key Takeaways
24. Trust in Organizations
25. Creativity and Innovation
26. Emotional Labor
27. Cross-Cultural Organizational Psychology
28. Organizational Learning
29. Ethics and Moral Psychology in Organizations
30. The Gig Economy and New Work Arrangements

## Slide Transcript

### Slide 1: Organizational Psychology

- The Science of Work and Human Behavior in Organizations
- Organizational psychology -- also called industrial-organizational (I-O) psychology -- applies psychological science to the workplace. It studies how people behave in organizations, how organizations affect people, and how to design work systems that optimize both human well-being and organizational effectiveness. With roots stretching back to World War I personnel selection, the field now addresses the full arc of working life: hiring, motivation, leadership, team dynamics, culture, stress, justice, and organizational change.

### Slide 2: Historical Foundations

- Organizational psychology emerged from the convergence of scientific management, personnel testing, and human relations research in the early 20th century.
- 1911: Scientific Management
- Frederick Taylor publishes "The Principles of Scientific Management," advocating systematic analysis of work tasks, time-motion studies, and standardized procedures. While criticized for dehumanizing workers, Taylor's emphasis on evidence-based management established the principle that work could be scientifically studied and improved.
- 1917: Army Alpha and Beta Tests
- During World War I, psychologists Robert Yerkes and colleagues develop group intelligence tests to classify 1.75 million military recruits. This massive undertaking demonstrated that psychological measurement could operate at scale and directly influenced postwar personnel selection practices in industry.
- 1924-1932: Hawthorne Studies
- Elton Mayo's research at Western Electric's Hawthorne Works reveals that social factors, attention, and group dynamics influence productivity more than physical working conditions. The "Hawthorne Effect" (behavioral change due to being observed) becomes a foundational concept. These studies launch the Human Relations movement.
- 1960s: Organizational Development
- Kurt Lewin's action research, T-groups, and change management frameworks establish organizational development (OD) as a discipline. Douglas McGregor's Theory X/Theory Y contrasts authoritarian and participative management assumptions. The field shifts from studying individual workers to studying organizations as systems.
- 2000s-Present: Evidence-Based Practice
- Meta-analysis, big data, people analytics, and replication movements push the field toward greater rigor. Topics expand to include remote work, artificial intelligence, diversity and inclusion, employee well-being, and the gig economy. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerates research on flexible work and organizational resilience.

### Slide 3: Motivation at Work

- Understanding why people exert effort, persist through difficulty, and direct their energy toward organizational goals is central to organizational psychology. Multiple theories address different facets of this question.
- Self-Determination Theory
- Deci and Ryan (1985, 2000) propose that intrinsic motivation depends on satisfying three basic psychological needs: autonomy (sense of choice and volition), competence (feeling effective), and relatedness (social connection). Work environments that support these needs produce higher quality motivation, greater persistence, better performance, and improved well-being. Controlling environments (surveillance, deadlines, contingent rewards) undermine intrinsic motivation.
- Goal-Setting Theory
- Locke and Latham's research (spanning 40+ years and 1,000+ studies) demonstrates that specific, difficult goals lead to higher performance than vague ("do your best") or easy goals -- provided the person has adequate ability, feedback, and commitment. Goal effects are among the most robust findings in organizational psychology: specific difficult goals improve performance by 10-25% compared to no goals or easy goals.
- Expectancy Theory
- Vroom (1964) proposes that motivation = Expectancy x Instrumentality x Valence. People are motivated when they believe (1) effort leads to performance (expectancy), (2) performance leads to outcomes (instrumentality), and (3) those outcomes are personally valued (valence). This rational model explains why people disengage when they perceive unfairness, futility, or irrelevant rewards.
- Job Characteristics Model
- Hackman and Oldham (1976) identify five core job dimensions that foster intrinsic motivation: skill variety, task identity, task significance, autonomy, and feedback. Jobs rich in these characteristics produce "critical psychological states" (experienced meaningfulness, responsibility, and knowledge of results) that enhance motivation, satisfaction, and performance while reducing absenteeism and turnover.

### Slide 4: Leadership

- Leadership is the most studied topic in organizational psychology. Despite thousands of studies, the field continues to evolve its understanding of what effective leadership looks like and how it develops.
- Transformational Leadership
- Bass (1985) describes leaders who inspire followers to transcend self-interest for the collective good through four mechanisms:
- Idealized influence: Serving as a role model who embodies values and earns trust
- Inspirational motivation: Articulating a compelling vision and expressing confidence in followers' ability to achieve it
- Intellectual stimulation: Challenging assumptions, encouraging innovation, and reframing problems
- Individualized consideration: Attending to each follower's unique needs, mentoring and developing them
- Meta-analyses show transformational leadership predicts follower satisfaction (r=.58), motivation (r=.52), and unit performance (r=.27) -- among the strongest effects in leadership research.
- Leader-Member Exchange (LMX)
- LMX theory (Graen & Uhl-Bien, 1995) focuses on the quality of dyadic relationships between leaders and individual followers. High-quality exchanges involve trust, mutual respect, and expanded role obligations. Low-quality exchanges are limited to formal contractual requirements. Research consistently shows that higher LMX quality predicts:
- Job performance (r=.30)
- Organizational citizenship behaviors (r=.37)
- Job satisfaction (r=.50)
- Lower turnover intentions (r=-.35)
- Lower role conflict and ambiguity
- However, differentiated LMX within teams (in-groups vs. out-groups) can undermine team cohesion and perceptions of justice.

### Slide 5: Team Dynamics

- Modern organizations increasingly rely on teams. Organizational psychology has identified the processes that distinguish effective teams from dysfunctional ones.
- Psychological Safety
- Amy Edmondson's (1999) concept describes a shared belief that the team is safe for interpersonal risk-taking -- speaking up, admitting errors, asking questions, and challenging the status quo without fear of punishment or humiliation. Google's "Project Aristotle" (2015) found psychological safety to be the strongest predictor of team effectiveness across 180 teams. Teams with high psychological safety learn faster, innovate more, and catch errors earlier.
- Team Mental Models
- Effective teams develop shared mental models -- similar understandings of the task, team roles, and strategies. When team members hold compatible mental models, they can anticipate each other's needs, coordinate implicitly (without explicit communication), and adapt to unexpected situations. Research in surgical teams, military units, and cockpit crews shows that shared mental models predict performance above and beyond individual expertise.
- Social Loafing
- Individuals tend to exert less effort in groups than alone -- the social loafing effect (Latane, Williams, & Harkins, 1979). This reduction can reach 20-40% of individual effort. Remedies include: making individual contributions identifiable, increasing task meaningfulness, keeping groups small, ensuring high group cohesion, and setting clear individual accountability alongside group goals.
- Conflict and Performance
- Task conflict (disagreements about work content and decisions) can improve team performance by fostering diverse perspectives -- but only when accompanied by trust and psychological safety. Relationship conflict (interpersonal tensions and animosity) is consistently detrimental. Meta-analyses show relationship conflict correlates r=-.22 with performance and r=-.54 with satisfaction. The key is cultivating "constructive controversy" while minimizing personal friction.

### Slide 6: Personnel Selection

- Selecting the right people for the right jobs is one of the oldest and most practically important applications of organizational psychology. Decades of research have established which selection methods work and which do not.
- Validity of Selection Methods (Meta-analytic findings)
- Schmidt and Hunter (1998) synthesized 85 years of research on selection method validity (correlation with job performance):
- MethodValidity (r)Notes
- Work sample tests.54Highest validity; directly simulate job tasks
- Structured interviews.51Standardized questions, behavioral anchors, multiple raters
- General cognitive ability (GMA).51Strongest single predictor across all jobs
- Integrity tests.41Predict counterproductive work behavior
- Unstructured interviews.38Variable quality; prone to bias
- Conscientiousness.31Best personality predictor; valid across all jobs
- Reference checks.26Limited by social desirability and legal constraints
- Job experience (years).18Weak predictor after initial learning period
- Graphology.02No validity; still used in some countries (e.g., France)

### Slide 7: Organizational Justice

- Perceptions of fairness profoundly influence employee attitudes and behavior. Organizational justice research identifies distinct types of fairness and their consequences.
- Distributive Justice
- Perceived fairness of outcomes (pay, promotions, resources). Based on Adams' (1965) equity theory: people compare their input-outcome ratio to others'. When ratios are unequal, they experience distress and attempt to restore equity -- through reduced effort, absenteeism, theft, or quitting. Underpayment inequity reduces performance; overpayment inequity may increase effort briefly but typically resolves through cognitive rationalization.
- Procedural Justice
- Perceived fairness of decision-making processes. Leventhal (1980) identifies six criteria: consistency, bias suppression, accuracy, correctability, representativeness, and ethicality. People accept unfavorable outcomes more readily when procedures are fair (the "fair process effect"). Procedural justice is a stronger predictor of organizational commitment and trust than distributive justice.
- Interactional Justice
- Perceived fairness of interpersonal treatment during procedure implementation. Includes: informational justice (adequate explanation of decisions) and interpersonal justice (dignity, respect, and sensitivity in treatment). Being laid off with an empathetic explanation generates less anger and fewer lawsuits than abrupt termination without explanation -- even when outcomes are identical.
- Consequences of Injustice
- Meta-analyses show justice perceptions predict: counterproductive work behavior (r=-.40), organizational citizenship behavior (r=.40), job satisfaction (r=.44), organizational commitment (r=.40), trust (r=.56), and turnover intentions (r=-.40). Injustice is also linked to stress, burnout, psychological distress, and even cardiovascular disease. Organizations with strong justice climates outperform those without.

### Slide 8: Organizational Culture

- Culture is the shared assumptions, values, and beliefs that shape behavior within an organization. It is both a powerful enabler and a stubborn obstacle to change.
- Edgar Schein's Three Levels
- Artifacts: Visible, tangible manifestations -- office layout, dress code, rituals, language, technology. Observable but difficult to interpret without deeper understanding.
- Espoused values: Stated strategies, goals, philosophies. What the organization says it believes. May or may not align with actual behavior.
- Basic assumptions: Deeply embedded, unconscious beliefs taken for granted. The true culture. Invisible, rarely questioned, extremely resistant to change. Examples: "conflict is bad," "individual achievement matters most," "the customer is always right."
- Culture change requires surfacing and challenging basic assumptions -- a process that typically takes 5-10 years for large organizations and often fails.
- Culture and Performance
- Research links specific cultural characteristics to organizational outcomes:
- Adaptability cultures predict innovation and growth in dynamic environments
- Clan (collaborative) cultures predict employee satisfaction and retention
- Market (competitive) cultures predict short-term financial performance
- Hierarchy (control) cultures predict efficiency and reliability in stable environments
- However, "culture fit" in hiring can perpetuate homogeneity. Research increasingly favors "culture add" -- hiring people who share core values but bring diverse perspectives and backgrounds.

### Slide 9: Occupational Stress and Burnout

- Work-related stress costs organizations billions in absenteeism, turnover, healthcare, and reduced productivity. Understanding its mechanisms is critical for prevention.
- Demand-Control Model
- Karasek (1979) proposes that strain results from high job demands combined with low decision latitude (control). The worst combination -- high demands, low control -- produces "high-strain" jobs with elevated cardiovascular disease risk, depression, and mortality. Adding social support (Demand-Control-Support model) moderates these effects. Active jobs (high demand, high control) can be energizing rather than depleting.
- Effort-Reward Imbalance
- Siegrist (1996) argues that strain results when high effort is not reciprocated by adequate rewards (salary, recognition, career opportunities, job security). Effort-reward imbalance predicts cardiovascular disease (OR=1.6-2.0), depression, poor self-rated health, and substance abuse. Individuals high in "overcommitment" (excessive striving, inability to withdraw from work) are especially vulnerable.
- Burnout
- Maslach and Jackson (1981) define burnout as three dimensions: emotional exhaustion (depleted energy), depersonalization/cynicism (detachment from work and people), and reduced personal accomplishment. Burnout is predicted by: work overload, lack of control, insufficient reward, breakdown of community, absence of fairness, and values conflicts. It is contagious within teams and predicts turnover, errors, accidents, and health problems.
- Recovery and Detachment
- Sonnentag's (2001) recovery research shows that psychological detachment from work during off-hours (mentally "switching off") is essential for replenishing depleted resources. People who fail to detach experience cumulative fatigue, impaired executive function, and accelerated burnout. Effective recovery involves: psychological detachment, relaxation, mastery experiences (learning new skills), and social activities (control over leisure time).

### Slide 10: Organizational Change

- Most organizational change efforts fail -- estimates range from 50-70% failure rates. Organizational psychology provides frameworks for understanding why and how to improve success rates.
- Lewin's Change Model
- Kurt Lewin's (1947) three-stage model remains influential:
- Unfreezing: Creating motivation for change by disrupting the status quo. Establishing urgency, challenging assumptions, and making the need for change emotionally compelling.
- Changing (Moving): Implementing new behaviors, processes, or structures. Providing training, resources, and support. Encouraging experimentation and learning.
- Refreezing: Stabilizing new patterns through reinforcement, institutionalization, and alignment of systems (rewards, structures, culture) with the desired state.
- Lewin's insight that change requires both driving forces (pushing toward change) and restraining forces (resisting change) -- and that reducing restraining forces is often more effective than increasing driving forces -- remains empirically supported.
- Resistance to Change
- Resistance is natural and often rational. Common sources include:
- Loss aversion: Potential losses loom larger than equivalent gains
- Uncertainty: Unknown outcomes create anxiety and defensive behavior
- Habit and inertia: Established routines require less cognitive effort
- Social disruption: Changes threaten existing relationships and power structures
- Lack of trust: Prior broken promises create cynicism about change motives
- Poor communication: Inadequate explanation of the "why" behind change
- Effective change management addresses resistance through participation, communication, support, negotiation, and (as a last resort) mandating -- in that order of preference.

### Slide 11: Performance Management

- The design of performance management systems profoundly affects motivation, development, and organizational outcomes -- yet traditional approaches are increasingly questioned.
- The Death of the Annual Review?
- By 2016, over 30% of large US companies had eliminated or radically restructured annual performance reviews. Research shows that once-yearly evaluations suffer from: recency bias (overweighting recent events), halo effects (one dimension contaminating all ratings), central tendency (avoiding extreme ratings), leniency bias, and motivational damage from forced ranking. Organizations including Deloitte, Microsoft, Adobe, and GE have shifted to continuous feedback, regular check-ins, and forward-looking development conversations.
- Goal Setting in Practice
- Effective performance management uses goal-setting principles: SMART goals (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) combined with OKRs (Objectives and Key Results) pioneered at Intel and popularized by Google. Key evidence: goals should be challenging but attainable, publicly committed to, supported by feedback, and linked to intrinsic purpose -- not merely tied to rewards.
- Feedback Delivery
- Feedback improves performance in only 60% of cases (Kluger & DeNisi, 1996 meta-analysis). It fails when: directed at the person rather than the task, threatening self-esteem, unclear, or delivered without actionable guidance. Effective feedback is specific, timely, focused on behavior (not character), balanced between positive and developmental, and delivered in a psychologically safe context.

### Slide 12: Diversity and Inclusion

- Organizational psychology increasingly addresses how identity-based differences affect workplace experiences and how organizations can create genuinely inclusive environments.
- The Business Case
- McKinsey research (2020) shows companies in the top quartile for gender diversity are 25% more likely to achieve above-average profitability; for ethnic diversity, 36% more likely. Diverse teams generate more innovative solutions (particularly for complex, non-routine problems), consider more alternatives, and make fewer errors -- provided they manage the increased process conflict effectively. However, diversity without inclusion produces conflict without benefit.
- Unconscious Bias
- Implicit biases affect hiring, promotion, performance evaluation, and daily interactions. Resume studies consistently show: identical resumes with "white-sounding" names receive 50% more callbacks than those with "Black-sounding" names. Women are rated lower on "leadership potential" for identical behaviors rated positively in men. Bias training alone has limited lasting effects; structural interventions (blind review, standardized criteria, diverse panels) are more effective.
- Inclusion Climate
- Inclusion goes beyond representation: it requires that all members feel valued, respected, and able to contribute fully. Nishii's (2013) research on inclusion climate identifies three dimensions: fair employment practices, integration of differences, and inclusion in decision-making. When inclusion climate is high, diversity leads to better outcomes; when low, diversity can actually harm team performance through identity threat and disengagement.

### Slide 13: Employee Engagement

- Engagement -- a state of vigor, dedication, and absorption in work -- is one of the most studied outcomes in contemporary organizational psychology.
- What Engagement Predicts
- Gallup's meta-analysis of 112 studies (2020) shows business units in the top quartile of engagement versus the bottom quartile experience:
- 23% higher profitability
- 18% higher productivity (sales)
- 81% lower absenteeism
- 43% lower turnover (low-turnover organizations)
- 64% fewer safety incidents
- 41% fewer quality defects
- 10% higher customer ratings
- Yet globally, only approximately 23% of employees report being engaged at work (Gallup, 2023). The engagement deficit represents an enormous opportunity cost.
- Drivers of Engagement
- The Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007) proposes that engagement results from abundant job resources (autonomy, feedback, social support, development opportunities, role clarity) and manageable demands. Key drivers consistently identified:
- Meaningful work and clear purpose
- Quality relationship with immediate manager
- Autonomy and voice in decisions
- Opportunities for growth and development
- Recognition and appreciation
- Supportive colleagues and team climate
- Fair compensation and treatment

### Slide 14: Work Design

- How work is structured -- the tasks, relationships, and context -- fundamentally shapes psychological outcomes. Work design research shows that well-designed jobs can satisfy basic human needs while poorly designed jobs create pathology.
- The SMART Work Design Model
- Parker (2014) synthesizes decades of research into the SMART model: Stimulating (skill variety, problem solving, task complexity), Mastery (task identity, feedback, role clarity), Agency (autonomy, schedule control, decision authority), Relational (social support, interdependence, social contact), and Tolerable demands (manageable workload, clear boundaries, work-life balance). Jobs scoring high on SMART dimensions predict engagement, creativity, proactive behavior, and well-being.
- Job Crafting
- Wrzesniewski and Dutton (2001) introduce job crafting: the proactive changes employees make to their own work tasks, relationships, and cognitive framing. Even in constrained roles, people can reshape their work to better align with strengths, motives, and passions. Research shows job crafting predicts engagement, performance, and well-being. Organizations can encourage crafting through flexible role boundaries and supportive management.
- Remote and Hybrid Work
- Research on remote work (accelerated by COVID-19) shows: productivity is maintained or increased for most knowledge workers; flexibility improves work-life balance and reduces commute stress; but social isolation, boundary blurring, and reduced informal learning are risks. Hybrid models (2-3 days in office) may optimize the tradeoffs -- preserving collaboration while allowing focused work and flexibility. Design principles from organizational psychology (autonomy, social connection, structure) inform effective remote work policies.

### Slide 15: Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB)

- Beyond formal job requirements, employees engage in discretionary behaviors that benefit the organization -- helping colleagues, volunteering for extra tasks, defending the organization, and showing conscientiousness. These "organizational citizenship behaviors" are critical for organizational functioning.
- Types of OCB
- Altruism: Helping specific colleagues with work-related problems
- Conscientiousness: Going beyond minimum requirements in attendance, punctuality, and rule adherence
- Sportsmanship: Tolerating inconveniences without complaining
- Courtesy: Preventing problems through proactive communication
- Civic virtue: Participating in organizational governance and keeping informed about organizational issues
- What Predicts OCB
- Meta-analyses identify key predictors of OCB:
- Job satisfaction (r=.24)
- Organizational commitment (r=.32)
- Perceived fairness/justice (r=.40)
- Leader supportiveness (r=.32)
- Conscientiousness (r=.22)
- Agreeableness (r=.13)
- Importantly, OCBs predict unit-level performance above and beyond individual task performance. Teams high in collective OCB outperform those low in OCB by significant margins, particularly in complex interdependent work.

### Slide 16: Power and Politics

- Organizations are inherently political systems where individuals and coalitions compete for scarce resources, influence, and status. Understanding power dynamics is essential for navigating and designing organizations.
- Bases of Power
- French and Raven (1959) identify five power bases: legitimate (formal authority), reward (ability to provide incentives), coercive (ability to punish), expert (knowledge-based influence), and referent (personal attraction/charisma). Research shows that "soft" power bases (expert, referent) predict follower satisfaction and commitment, while "hard" bases (coercive, legitimate) predict compliance but also resistance and resentment.
- The Corrosion of Power
- Keltner's (2016) research shows that gaining power reduces empathy, increases risk-taking, and diminishes perspective-taking ability. Powerful individuals are more likely to objectify others, violate norms, and act impulsively. The "power paradox": the empathetic, collaborative behaviors that help people gain power are precisely those undermined by holding power. Organizations must design structures that check power and maintain accountability.
- Political Skill
- Ferris et al. (2005) define political skill as the ability to understand others and use that knowledge to influence behavior in ways that advance personal and organizational objectives. Four dimensions: social astuteness, interpersonal influence, networking ability, and apparent sincerity. Political skill predicts career success (promotions, salary), job performance ratings, and leadership effectiveness -- independent of cognitive ability and personality.

### Slide 17: Decision Making in Organizations

- Organizations are decision-making systems. How decisions are made -- and the biases that distort them -- determines organizational effectiveness.
- Bounded Rationality
- Herbert Simon's (1955) Nobel Prize-winning insight: human decision-makers have limited cognitive capacity, incomplete information, and finite time. Rather than optimizing (finding the best solution), people "satisfice" -- choosing the first option that meets a minimum threshold of acceptability. Organizations can improve decisions by: structuring information, reducing cognitive load, establishing decision criteria in advance, and creating processes that aggregate diverse perspectives.
- Groupthink
- Janis (1972) identifies groupthink: a deterioration of judgment in highly cohesive groups under pressure. Symptoms include: illusion of invulnerability, collective rationalization, stereotyping of outgroups, self-censorship, illusion of unanimity, and direct pressure on dissenters. Antidotes: assigning devil's advocates, seeking outside opinions, anonymous input channels, leader impartiality, and creating psychological safety for dissent. Historical examples: Bay of Pigs, Challenger disaster, Enron.
- Cognitive Biases in Organizations
- Common organizational biases include: confirmation bias (seeking evidence that supports existing beliefs), sunk cost fallacy (continuing failing projects due to past investment), anchoring (over-relying on initial information), availability heuristic (overweighting vivid or recent events), overconfidence (calibration error in probability estimates), and escalation of commitment (doubling down on failing courses of action). Debiasing strategies include structured decision protocols, premortem analysis, red teams, and decision audits.

### Slide 18: Organizational Socialization

- How newcomers learn the ropes -- acquiring knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviors needed to function as organizational members -- profoundly shapes their long-term outcomes.
- Stages of Socialization
- Anticipatory: Pre-entry expectations formed through recruitment, reputation, and previous experiences. Realistic job previews reduce early turnover by 10-20% by calibrating expectations. Encounter: First weeks/months of reality shock, sense-making, and learning. The most critical period for retention. Metamorphosis: Adjustment, competence development, and identity integration. Newcomer becomes an accepted insider.
- Onboarding Effectiveness
- Meta-analyses show that effective onboarding predicts: role clarity (r=.48), self-efficacy (r=.42), social acceptance (r=.40), job satisfaction (r=.44), organizational commitment (r=.41), and reduced turnover (r=-.27). Key practices: structured orientation programs, assigned mentors/buddies, early meaningful work, manager check-ins, socialization events, and gradual task loading. New employees who report feeling "organizationally embedded" within 90 days are 3x less likely to leave within the first year.
- Newcomer Proactivity
- Socialization is not passive absorption. Proactive newcomers who seek information, build relationships, and negotiate their roles achieve better adjustment faster. Key proactive behaviors include: feedback seeking (asking for performance information), relationship building (initiating social contact), job-change negotiation (modifying tasks to fit strengths), and positive framing (cognitively reappraising challenges as opportunities). Organizations should design environments that encourage and reward newcomer proactivity.

### Slide 19: Work-Life Balance

- The boundary between work and non-work life is a central concern of modern organizational psychology, with implications for well-being, gender equity, and organizational performance.
- Border/Boundary Theory
- Clark (2000) and Ashforth et al. (2000) describe how individuals manage the boundary between work and family domains. Some people prefer integration (blurring boundaries, working from home, taking personal calls at work), while others prefer segmentation (strict separation). Misfit between preference and environment creates strain. The rise of remote work and smartphones has made boundary management increasingly difficult -- "always-on" cultures erode recovery and family time.
- Organizational Policies
- Research-supported policies for work-life balance include:
- Flexible scheduling: Meta-analysis shows flex-time reduces turnover (d=.34) and absenteeism (d=.22) while maintaining or improving productivity
- Paid parental leave: Associated with higher female retention, reduced gender wage gaps, and improved child development outcomes
- Workload management: Overwork (55+ hours/week) increases stroke risk by 35% and heart disease risk by 17%
- Right to disconnect: Legislation in France, Portugal, Belgium, and others protecting employees from after-hours communication
- Supervisor support: The strongest moderator of work-family conflict -- supportive managers buffer strain even when policies are absent

### Slide 20: Counterproductive Work Behavior

- The dark side of organizational behavior: theft, sabotage, aggression, harassment, withdrawal, and other acts that harm organizations and their members.
- Prevalence and Costs
- Employee theft costs US businesses an estimated $50 billion annually. Workplace aggression affects 40-70% of workers across their careers. Cyberloafing (personal internet use at work) consumes an estimated 1-3 hours daily for many employees. Presenteeism (attending work while sick or disengaged) costs more than absenteeism. The total cost of CWB may exceed $200 billion annually in the US alone.
- Predictors
- Strongest predictors of CWB include: perceived injustice (r=.40), job dissatisfaction (r=.35), interpersonal conflict (r=.32), abusive supervision (r=.38), low conscientiousness (r=-.35), and situational constraints (inadequate resources, unclear expectations). CWB is best understood as a response to felt injustice or frustration -- a "rebalancing" of perceived inequity through harmful acts. Prevention requires addressing root causes, not merely surveillance.
- Workplace Bullying
- Repeated, systematic mistreatment over time. Prevalence: 10-15% of workers report being bullied. Consequences for targets include: anxiety, depression, PTSD symptoms, cardiovascular disease, sleep disorders, and suicidal ideation. Organizational antecedents: high competitive pressure, role conflicts, organizational restructuring, and leadership that tolerates or models aggressive behavior. Countries with anti-bullying legislation (Scandinavia, Australia, France) show lower but not eliminated prevalence.

### Slide 21: Positive Organizational Psychology

- A growing movement focuses not only on fixing dysfunction but on building thriving organizations where people flourish.
- Psychological Capital (PsyCap)
- Luthans et al. (2007) define PsyCap as four state-like resources: self-efficacy (confidence), optimism (positive attribution style), hope (goal-directed energy with pathways thinking), and resilience (bouncing back from adversity). Meta-analyses show PsyCap predicts: job performance (r=.26), satisfaction (r=.44), OCB (r=.28), and reduced CWB (r=-.29). Importantly, PsyCap is developable through targeted interventions -- 2-3 hour micro-interventions produce measurable improvements.
- Strengths-Based Approaches
- Rather than fixing weaknesses, strengths-based management identifies and leverages individual talents. Gallup research shows people who use their strengths daily are: 6x more likely to be engaged, 3x more likely to report excellent quality of life, and 8% more productive. CliftonStrengths assessments (used by 90% of Fortune 500 companies) identify dominant talent themes. Teams with complementary strengths outperform homogeneous teams.
- Thriving at Work
- Spreitzer et al. (2005) define thriving as the combination of vitality (feeling energized and alive) and learning (sense of growing and developing). Thriving employees show 16% better overall performance, 32% more commitment to the organization, 125% less burnout, and 46% more satisfaction. Thriving is predicted by: decision-making discretion, broad information sharing, civility in workplace interactions, and performance feedback.

### Slide 22: People Analytics and the Future

- The convergence of big data, machine learning, and organizational science is transforming how organizations understand and manage their workforce.
- People Analytics
- Organizations increasingly use data to inform HR decisions: predicting turnover risk, identifying high-potential employees, optimizing team composition, detecting early burnout signals, and measuring culture through communication patterns. Google's People Operations pioneered many approaches: algorithmic hiring scoring, predictive retention models, and A/B testing of management practices. Ethical concerns include surveillance, algorithmic bias, privacy, and the potential for manipulation.
- Emerging Challenges
- AI and automation: Displacing routine work while creating demand for uniquely human skills (creativity, emotional intelligence, complex judgment)
- Gig economy: Traditional employment relationships fragmenting; organizational belonging becoming fluid
- Remote/hybrid work: Redesigning organizations for distributed collaboration
- Generational shifts: Purpose, flexibility, and development increasingly valued over traditional career paths
- Well-being as strategy: Mental health moving from peripheral benefit to core organizational capability
- Climate and sustainability: Green organizational behavior and corporate environmental responsibility

### Slide 23: Key Takeaways

- Organizational psychology demonstrates that work is not merely an economic activity but a psychological one. How work is designed, how people are led, how decisions are made, and how fairness is maintained determine whether organizations bring out the best or worst in human nature. The evidence consistently shows that treating employees as whole human beings -- with needs for autonomy, mastery, connection, meaning, and fairness -- produces superior organizational outcomes alongside human flourishing. This is not idealism; it is what 100 years of rigorous research demonstrates.
- "The deepest urge in human nature is the desire to be important." -- John Dewey, frequently cited by Dale Carnegie and echoed throughout motivation research
- Organizational psychology bridges the gap between individual well-being and organizational effectiveness, showing that these goals are not in tension but are mutually reinforcing when work systems are properly designed.

### Slide 24: Trust in Organizations

- Trust is the lubricant of organizational life. Without it, coordination costs skyrocket, information hoarding replaces sharing, and defensive behavior replaces collaboration.
- Dimensions of Trust
- Mayer, Davis, and Schoorman (1995) identify three antecedents of trust: ability (competence in the relevant domain), benevolence (genuine concern for the trustor's welfare), and integrity (adherence to principles the trustor finds acceptable). Trust is the willingness to be vulnerable to another party based on positive expectations. It operates at multiple levels: interpersonal (between individuals), team (within groups), and institutional (in organizational systems and leadership).
- Trust and Performance
- Meta-analyses show trust predicts: job performance (r=.33), organizational citizenship behavior (r=.38), job satisfaction (r=.51), organizational commitment (r=.49), and reduced turnover intentions (r=-.40). High-trust organizations outperform low-trust organizations on virtually every metric. Trust enables knowledge sharing, risk-taking, innovation, and the psychological safety needed for learning from failure.
- Trust Repair
- Once broken, trust is difficult but not impossible to restore. Research shows effective trust repair requires: acknowledging the violation, providing a credible explanation (internal attributions require more repair than external ones), demonstrating changed behavior over time, offering structural assurances (mechanisms preventing future violations), and showing vulnerability. Competence-based trust violations are repaired through demonstration of ability; integrity-based violations require apology, penance, and sustained behavioral change.

### Slide 25: Creativity and Innovation

- Organizations increasingly depend on creative problem-solving and innovation for competitive advantage. Research identifies the individual, team, and organizational conditions that foster -- or suppress -- creative output.
- Individual Creativity
- Amabile's componential model (1988) identifies three requirements for individual creativity: domain-relevant skills (expertise), creativity-relevant processes (divergent thinking, risk tolerance, persistence), and intrinsic task motivation. Intrinsic motivation is the most malleable component -- and the most vulnerable to organizational interference. Expected evaluation, surveillance, competition, and constrained choice all reduce creative output. Autonomy, mastery experiences, and meaningful challenges enhance it.
- Organizational Innovation Climate
- Anderson, Potocnik, and Zhou (2014) identify key organizational factors supporting innovation:
- Leadership support: Leaders who model openness, tolerate failure, and resource experimentation
- Psychological safety: Permission to take risks and propose unconventional ideas
- Autonomy: Freedom in how work is approached (not just what is done)
- Slack resources: Time and budget for exploration beyond immediate demands
- Knowledge diversity: Cross-functional teams with varied expertise and perspectives
- Constructive conflict: Task debate without relationship damage

### Slide 26: Emotional Labor

- Many jobs require managing emotional expression as part of role performance -- displaying emotions one may not feel. This "emotional labor" has significant psychological costs.
- Surface vs. Deep Acting
- Hochschild (1983) distinguishes: Surface acting -- modifying outward emotional expression without changing inner feelings (faking a smile). Deep acting -- actively working to change one's actual emotions to match display requirements (genuinely trying to feel sympathy). Research shows surface acting is more depleting and is associated with emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and job dissatisfaction. Deep acting is less harmful and may even be intrinsically rewarding when successful.
- Consequences
- Meta-analyses show surface acting predicts: emotional exhaustion (r=.36), depersonalization (r=.19), reduced personal accomplishment (r=-.15), and job dissatisfaction (r=-.24). Emotional labor is particularly intense in service, healthcare, education, and emotional care work -- disproportionately performed by women. The costs are not merely psychological: chronic emotional suppression is associated with cardiovascular reactivity and impaired immune function.
- Organizational Responses
- Organizations can mitigate emotional labor costs through: granting employees authenticity latitude (not scripting every interaction), providing emotional recovery time between demanding interactions, creating supportive peer relationships for emotional processing, reducing abusive customer contact through policy, training in deep acting techniques, and recognizing emotional labor as skilled work deserving fair compensation.

### Slide 27: Cross-Cultural Organizational Psychology

- Organizational psychology findings do not always generalize across cultures. Understanding cultural variation in work values, leadership preferences, and organizational behavior is critical in a globalized economy.
- Hofstede's Dimensions
- Hofstede's research (originally IBM employees in 50+ countries) identified cultural dimensions that influence workplace behavior:
- Power distance: Acceptance of hierarchical inequality (high: Malaysia, Mexico; low: Denmark, Israel)
- Individualism vs. collectivism: Priority of personal vs. group goals (individualist: USA, Australia; collectivist: Japan, China)
- Uncertainty avoidance: Tolerance for ambiguity (high: Greece, Japan; low: Singapore, Sweden)
- Masculinity vs. femininity: Emphasis on achievement vs. quality of life
- Long-term orientation: Planning horizon and persistence
- GLOBE Project
- The Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness (GLOBE) project (House et al., 2004) studied 62 societies and identified culturally endorsed implicit leadership theories (CLTs). Key findings: charismatic/value-based leadership is universally endorsed but implemented differently; participative leadership is valued in individualistic cultures but seen as weakness in high power-distance cultures; team-oriented leadership is universally positive; autonomous leadership varies dramatically (positive in Germanic Europe, negative in Latin America). "Universal" management principles require cultural adaptation.

### Slide 28: Organizational Learning

- How organizations acquire, retain, and apply knowledge determines their adaptability and long-term survival. Learning organizations outperform rigid ones in dynamic environments.
- Single and Double-Loop Learning
- Argyris and Schon (1978) distinguish: Single-loop learning -- detecting and correcting errors within existing frameworks (adjusting a thermostat). Double-loop learning -- questioning and changing the underlying assumptions, norms, and objectives (asking whether heating is the right approach). Most organizations default to single-loop learning; double-loop learning requires psychological safety, power equalization, and willingness to challenge sacred assumptions. Organizational crises often trigger double-loop learning by making existing assumptions untenable.
- Knowledge Management
- Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995) describe knowledge creation as moving between tacit knowledge (embodied, experiential, difficult to articulate) and explicit knowledge (codified, transmissible). The SECI model: Socialization (tacit-to-tacit, through shared experience), Externalization (tacit-to-explicit, through articulation), Combination (explicit-to-explicit, through systematization), and Internalization (explicit-to-tacit, through practice). Organizations that manage all four conversions effectively create new knowledge faster than competitors.
- Learning from Failure
- Edmondson (2011) argues organizations must distinguish: preventable failures (deviations from known processes -- should be reduced), complexity-related failures (system failures in uncertain environments -- inevitable, should be managed), and intelligent failures (well-planned experiments that produce valuable information -- should be celebrated). Most organizations punish all failure equally, suppressing the experimentation essential for innovation. Psychologically safe cultures treat intelligent failure as investment in learning.

### Slide 29: Ethics and Moral Psychology in Organizations

- Why do good people sometimes do bad things at work? Organizational psychology reveals how situational pressures, group dynamics, and institutional structures can erode individual moral behavior.
- Ethical Fading
- Bazerman and Tenbrunsel (2011) describe "ethical fading" -- the process by which the moral dimensions of a decision become invisible. Through euphemistic language ("aggressive accounting" instead of "fraud"), slippery slopes (small incremental violations), outcome framing (focusing on business results rather than moral implications), and self-serving bias, people make unethical choices without experiencing moral distress. The decision does not feel like an ethical dilemma because its ethical dimensions have faded from view.
- Ethical Climate and Leadership
- Victor and Cullen (1988) identify distinct ethical climates: caring (concern for others' welfare), law and code (adherence to rules), rules (organizational policies), instrumental (self-interest), and independence (personal morality). Ethical leadership -- modeling integrity, holding others accountable, communicating ethical standards -- is the strongest predictor of ethical climate. Trevino et al. (2003) show ethical leaders are both "moral persons" (honest, fair, principled) and "moral managers" (actively promoting ethics through rewards, punishments, and communication).

### Slide 30: The Gig Economy and New Work Arrangements

- Traditional employment relationships are fragmenting. Organizational psychology must adapt its models to account for freelancers, platform workers, portfolio careers, and fluid organizational boundaries.
- Psychological Contracts
- Rousseau (1989) defines the psychological contract as an individual's beliefs about mutual obligations between employee and employer. Traditional contracts assumed loyalty and long-term employment in exchange for security and development. Contemporary contracts are increasingly "transactional" (short-term, specified exchanges) rather than "relational" (open-ended, trust-based). Gig workers may have no psychological contract at all -- or form contracts with platforms, clients, and professional communities simultaneously.
- Precarity and Well-being
- Research on gig workers reveals: greater autonomy and flexibility (valued), but also income uncertainty, social isolation, lack of benefits, absence of career development, algorithmic management, and difficulty maintaining work-life boundaries. The absence of organizational belonging and colleague relationships removes a primary source of social support and identity. Policy debates center on whether platform workers should be classified as employees with associated protections.
- Boundaryless Careers
- Arthur and Rousseau (1996) describe "boundaryless careers" -- sequences of job opportunities that transcend single employers. Protean careers (Hall, 2004) are self-directed, values-driven, and adaptable. These models better fit contemporary reality but also place greater burden on individuals for career management, skill development, and identity construction. Organizational psychology is increasingly studying career adaptability, employability, and the psychological resources needed for navigating uncertain career landscapes.


## Related Decks

- [Behavioral Psychology](https://shipslides.com/d/psychology-behavioral)
- [Clinical Psychology](https://shipslides.com/d/psychology-clinical)
- [Cognitive Biases — Glitches in Human Reasoning](https://shipslides.com/d/psychology-cognitive-biases)
- [Cognitive Psychology](https://shipslides.com/d/psychology-cognitive)