shipslides
Tech15 slides0 views

Quantum Computing

Harnessing the strange laws of quantum mechanics -- superposition, entanglement, and interference -- to solve problems beyond the reach of any classical...

StandaloneDownload
Sandboxed deck
Open raw

About this HTML presentation

This Shipslides page presents Quantum Computing as an interactive HTML presentation deck in the Technology catalog with 15 slides. The share page keeps the uploaded deck sandboxed while exposing readable context, topics, and a slide outline for viewers and search engines.

Harnessing the strange laws of quantum mechanics -- superposition, entanglement, and interference -- to solve problems beyond the reach of any classical computer. Key sections include: Quantum Computing; Classical vs. Quantum; Historical Timeline; Qubit Technologies; Quantum Algorithms; The Error Correction Challenge; Applications: Drug Discovery and Chemistry; Applications: Optimization and Finance; Quantum Cryptography; The Quantum Computing Industry.

Key sections

  • 01Quantum Computing
  • 02Classical vs. Quantum
  • 03Historical Timeline
  • 04Qubit Technologies
  • 05Quantum Algorithms
  • 06The Error Correction Challenge
  • 07Applications: Drug Discovery and Chemistry
  • 08Applications: Optimization and Finance
  • 09Quantum Cryptography
  • 10The Quantum Computing Industry
  • 11Quantum Machine Learning
  • 12Quantum Internet and Communication
  • 13Timeline: When Will Quantum Computers Matter?
  • 14Key Takeaways
Slide outline
  1. 01Quantum Computing
  2. 02Classical vs. Quantum
  3. 03Historical Timeline
  4. 04Qubit Technologies
  5. 05Quantum Algorithms
  6. 06The Error Correction Challenge
  7. 07Applications: Drug Discovery and Chemistry
  8. 08Applications: Optimization and Finance
  9. 09Quantum Cryptography
  10. 10The Quantum Computing Industry
  11. 11Quantum Machine Learning
  12. 12Quantum Internet and Communication
  13. 13Timeline: When Will Quantum Computers Matter?
  14. 14Key Takeaways
Page data
Canonical
https://shipslides.com/d/technology-quantum-computing
Category
Technology
Size
22.2 KB
Updated
2026-05-17
LLM text
https://shipslides.com/d/technology-quantum-computing/llms.txt

Presentation Transcript

Detailed slide-by-slide text content extracted from this presentation.

Slide 01

Quantum Computing

  • Technology • Quantum
  • Harnessing the strange laws of quantum mechanics -- superposition, entanglement, and interference -- to solve problems beyond the reach of any classical computer.
  • QubitsSuperpositionEntanglementAlgorithmsCryptography
Slide 02

Classical vs. Quantum

  • Classical Computing
  • Bits: Binary states: 0 or 1. Deterministic. A 64-bit register stores one of 2^64 possible values at any time. Process information sequentially (or with limited parallelism).
  • Quantum Computing
  • Qubits: Exist in superposition of 0 and 1 simultaneously (alpha|0> + beta|1>). N qubits represent 2^N states simultaneously. 300 qubits can represent more states than atoms in the observable universe.
  • Key Quantum Properties
  • Superposition: Qubit exists in multiple states until measured. Enables parallel exploration of solution spaces.
  • Entanglement: Qubits become correlated -- measuring one instantly determines the other regardless of distance. "Spooky action at a distance" (Einstein).
  • Interference: Quantum states can amplify correct answers and cancel wrong ones. The key to quantum speedup.
  • No-cloning theorem: Cannot copy unknown quantum state. Basis for quantum cryptography security.
  • "If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics."-- Richard Feynman
Slide 03

Historical Timeline

  • 1981
  • Feynman proposes quantum computers to simulate quantum physics: "Nature isn't classical, dammit"
  • 1985
  • David Deutsch describes universal quantum computer (quantum Turing machine)
  • 1994
  • Peter Shor develops algorithm for factoring large numbers exponentially faster -- threatens RSA encryption
  • 1996
  • Lov Grover develops search algorithm with quadratic speedup
  • 1998
  • First 2-qubit quantum computer built (IBM/Oxford)
  • 2001
  • IBM factors 15 using Shor's algorithm on 7-qubit NMR system
  • 2011
  • D-Wave sells first "quantum computer" (quantum annealer, 128 qubits). Controversy over whether it's truly quantum.
  • 2019
  • Google "quantum supremacy": Sycamore (53 qubits) solves problem in 200 seconds vs. estimated 10,000 years classical
  • 2022
  • IBM unveils 433-qubit Osprey processor. Error rates still limit utility.
  • 2023
  • IBM 1,121-qubit Condor. Harvard/QuEra create 48 logical qubits with error correction.
  • 2024
  • Google Willow: 105 physical qubits, below error-correction threshold. Microsoft announces topological qubit progress.
  • 2025
  • Race toward fault-tolerant quantum computing intensifies. Hybrid quantum-classical approaches dominate near-term.
Slide 04

Qubit Technologies

  • Superconducting
  • Josephson junctions cooled to 15 millikelvin (colder than outer space). Used by IBM, Google, Rigetti. Fast gate times (ns). Short coherence (~100 microseconds). Most mature approach. Requires massive dilution refrigerators.
  • Trapped Ions
  • Individual atoms held in electromagnetic traps, manipulated with lasers. IonQ, Quantinuum (Honeywell). Long coherence times (minutes). High gate fidelity (99.9%+). Slower gates. Full connectivity between qubits.
  • Photonic
  • Qubits encoded in photons. Xanadu, PsiQuantum. Room temperature operation. Natural for networking. Measurement-based computation. Photon loss is main challenge. PsiQuantum targeting 1M+ qubits.
  • Neutral Atoms
  • Arrays of individual atoms held by optical tweezers. QuEra, Pasqal, Atom Computing. Scalable (1000+ qubits demonstrated). Reconfigurable connectivity. Rapidly advancing.
  • Topological
  • Microsoft's approach. Qubits encoded in exotic quasiparticles (Majorana fermions). Inherently error-protected by topology. Theoretically superior but unproven experimentally. "Holy grail" approach.
  • Silicon Spin
  • Electron or nuclear spins in silicon quantum dots. Intel, UNSW. Leverages existing semiconductor fabrication. Small qubits enable density. Compatibility with classical chip manufacturing.
Slide 05

Quantum Algorithms

  • Shor's Algorithm (1994)
  • Purpose: Factor large numbers in polynomial time. Classical best: sub-exponential. A 4,096-bit RSA key requires ~20M physical qubits to break. Threatens all public-key cryptography.
  • Grover's Algorithm (1996)
  • Purpose: Search unsorted database of N items in sqrt(N) time vs. N classically. Quadratic speedup. Implications for symmetric encryption (AES-256 effectively becomes AES-128).
  • VQE/QAOA
  • Variational methods: Hybrid quantum-classical algorithms for near-term devices. Quantum circuit parameterized, classical optimizer adjusts parameters. Used for chemistry and optimization problems.
  • Quantum Speedup Classes
  • Exponential: Factoring (Shor), certain simulations. Transformative -- problems become tractable that were impossible.
  • Polynomial: Grover search (quadratic). Useful but not transformative alone.
  • No speedup: Most everyday computing. Quantum computers will NOT replace classical for general tasks.
  • BQP Complexity Class
  • Bounded-error Quantum Polynomial time: Problems solvable efficiently by quantum computer. Contains P and BPP. Relationship to NP unknown -- quantum computers likely cannot solve all NP problems (but may solve some).
  • "Quantum computers will be like a flashlight -- brilliant for illuminating dark spaces, but you wouldn't use one to read a book."-- Scott Aaronson, UT Austin quantum complexity theorist
Slide 06

The Error Correction Challenge

  • Today's qubits are "noisy" -- they lose quantum information (decohere) and accumulate errors rapidly. Quantum error correction is the critical unsolved engineering challenge.
  • The Problem
  • Error rates: Current physical qubit error: ~0.1-1% per operation. Useful computation requires error rates below ~10^-10. Gap: 8 orders of magnitude. Must be bridged by error correction.
  • Decoherence: Quantum information degrades through interaction with environment. Coherence times: microseconds (superconducting) to minutes (trapped ions). Every operation must complete before decoherence.
  • Error Correction
  • Logical qubits: Encode one logical qubit across many physical qubits. Surface code: ~1,000-10,000 physical qubits per logical qubit. A useful quantum computer may need millions of physical qubits.
  • 2023 breakthrough: Harvard/QuEra demonstrated 48 logical qubits with below-threshold error correction. Google Willow (2024) showed errors decrease as system scales -- first time crossing threshold.
  • NISQ era: Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum -- current machines (50-1000 noisy qubits). Limited utility. "Quantum advantage" demonstrated but not yet "quantum utility" for practical problems.
Slide 07

Applications: Drug Discovery and Chemistry

  • Simulating molecular systems is exponentially hard for classical computers but natural for quantum ones. Feynman's original motivation: simulate physics with physics.
  • Why Chemistry?
  • Electron correlation: Exact simulation of molecule with N electrons scales as 2^N classically. Caffeine (24 electrons) already pushes classical limits for exact methods. Quantum: scales polynomially.
  • Applications: Catalyst design, battery materials, drug binding simulations, nitrogen fixation (replacing Haber-Bosch), room-temperature superconductors, carbon capture materials.
  • Current Progress
  • Largest molecule simulated exactly: ~20 qubits (small molecules like H2, LiH, BeH2)
  • Useful pharmaceutical simulations need ~1M physical qubits (2035-2040?)
  • Near-term: hybrid methods (VQE) for approximate solutions
  • Companies: Qu&Co, QSimulate, Rahko (acquired), ProteinQure
  • "Nature isn't classical, dammit, and if you want to make a simulation of nature, you'd better make it quantum mechanical."-- Richard Feynman, 1981 (proposing quantum computing)
Slide 08

Applications: Optimization and Finance

  • Optimization Problems
  • Combinatorial optimization: Routing, scheduling, portfolio optimization, logistics. NP-hard problems where finding optimal solution among exponential possibilities. QAOA and quantum annealing approaches.
  • Examples: Traveling salesman, vehicle routing (UPS saves $50M/year per minute of optimized routes), airline scheduling, supply chain optimization, protein folding (combinatorial structure search).
  • Finance
  • Portfolio optimization: Finding optimal asset allocation considering correlations, constraints, and risk. Markowitz model with 1,000 assets: intractable classically. Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan investing heavily.
  • Monte Carlo simulation: Pricing derivatives, risk assessment. Quantum amplitude estimation offers quadratic speedup. Could accelerate from overnight to real-time.
  • Fraud detection: Pattern recognition in high-dimensional transaction data. Quantum machine learning for anomaly detection. Still theoretical advantage.
Slide 09

Quantum Cryptography

  • The Threat
  • "Harvest now, decrypt later": Nation-states collecting encrypted data today to decrypt when quantum computers mature. NIST estimates: RSA-2048 broken by ~2030-2035. All historical encrypted communications at risk.
  • Post-Quantum Cryptography
  • NIST Standards (2024): CRYSTALS-Kyber (key encapsulation), CRYSTALS-Dilithium (digital signatures), SPHINCS+ (hash-based signatures). Based on lattice problems and hash functions. Migration: "Y2Q" moment approaching.
  • Quantum Key Distribution (QKD)
  • BB84 Protocol (1984): Bennett & Brassard. Uses quantum properties: measuring a qubit disturbs it. Eavesdropper detected by increased error rate. Provably secure by laws of physics (not computational assumptions).
  • China's QUESS satellite (2017): QKD over 1,200 km
  • China's 2,000 km Beijing-Shanghai quantum network operational
  • Limitations: distance (fiber loss), rate, infrastructure cost
  • Commercial: ID Quantique, Toshiba QKD systems deployed
  • "The quantum computer is a threat we must prepare for now, not when it arrives."-- NIST, announcing post-quantum cryptography standards, 2024
Slide 10

The Quantum Computing Industry

  • Major Players
  • IBM: Superconducting qubits. 1,121-qubit Condor (2023). Qiskit open-source framework. Quantum Network (200+ partners). Roadmap: 100K qubits by 2033.
  • Google: Sycamore (quantum supremacy, 2019). Willow (2024): below error-correction threshold. Cirq framework. Targeting "useful quantum computation" by 2029.
  • Microsoft: Topological qubits (long-term bet). Azure Quantum cloud platform. Strong in software stack (Q#). Partnership with Quantinuum.
  • Startups: IonQ (trapped ions, public), Rigetti (superconducting, public), PsiQuantum (photonic, $700M raised), QuEra (neutral atoms), Xanadu (photonic).
  • Investment and Market
  • $35B+
  • total investment in quantum computing companies (2015-2024)
  • Government spending: US ($1.2B NQIA), China ($15B estimated), EU ($1.2B), UK ($3.5B over 10 years)
  • Market forecast: $65B by 2030 (McKinsey), $850B+ by 2040
  • Cloud access: IBM, AWS Braket, Azure Quantum, Google Quantum AI -- democratizing experimentation
  • "We are in the 'vacuum tube era' of quantum computing. The transistor moment is coming."-- Adapted from IBM quantum roadmap presentations
Slide 11

Quantum Machine Learning

  • Quantum machine learning (QML) explores whether quantum computers can speed up or improve ML tasks. Theoretical advantages exist but practical demonstration remains limited.
  • Approaches
  • Quantum kernels: Map data to quantum Hilbert space. Compute kernel functions quantum computers can evaluate efficiently. Potential for better classification of certain structured data.
  • Variational quantum circuits: Parameterized quantum circuits as ML models. Trained via classical optimization. "Quantum neural networks." Near-term compatible (NISQ).
  • Quantum sampling: Generate samples from complex distributions. Potential for generative models, Boltzmann machines. Quantum speedup for specific sampling tasks proven.
  • Skepticism and Hype
  • No proven quantum advantage for practical ML tasks yet
  • "Barren plateau" problem: gradients vanish exponentially with qubits in variational circuits
  • Classical ML already extremely efficient (GPUs, TPUs)
  • Most promising: quantum simulation of quantum systems for ML in chemistry/materials
  • Data loading bottleneck: getting classical data into quantum state is expensive
  • "The question is not whether quantum machine learning is possible, but whether it offers advantage over the best classical methods -- and for which specific problems."-- John Preskill, Caltech, who coined "NISQ" era
Slide 12

Quantum Internet and Communication

  • Vision
  • Quantum internet: Network of quantum computers connected by quantum channels. Enable distributed quantum computing, secure communication, and applications impossible classically (quantum teleportation of states).
  • Building Blocks
  • Quantum repeaters: Extend entanglement over long distances. Classical signal: amplify. Quantum: can't copy (no-cloning). Must use entanglement swapping.
  • Quantum memories: Store quantum states. Current best: minutes (trapped atoms). Need hours-days for practical networks.
  • Photonic links: Photons carry quantum information over fiber or free-space. Loss in fiber limits to ~100km without repeaters.
  • Progress
  • Netherlands: QuTech building first metro-scale quantum network (Delft-The Hague-Amsterdam). Multi-node entanglement demonstrated 2022.
  • China: 4,600 km integrated quantum communication network (satellite + fiber). Beijing-Shanghai backbone operational since 2017. QUESS satellite: intercontinental QKD.
  • US: DOE quantum internet blueprint. Chicago quantum network testbed. NASA/Caltech: teleportation over 44km of fiber (2020, 90% fidelity).
  • "A quantum internet would be to a classical internet what a quantum computer is to a classical computer -- enabling qualitatively new capabilities."-- Stephanie Wehner, QuTech, architect of quantum internet roadmap
Slide 13

Timeline: When Will Quantum Computers Matter?

  • Near-Term (2025-2030)
  • NISQ applications: quantum chemistry approximations, optimization heuristics
  • Quantum advantage for specific scientific problems
  • 1,000-10,000 physical qubit systems
  • First commercial quantum advantage (narrow applications)
  • Post-quantum cryptography migration underway
  • Medium-Term (2030-2040)
  • Error-corrected logical qubits (1,000+)
  • Drug discovery and materials science acceleration
  • Cryptographically relevant quantum computers
  • Financial optimization at scale
  • Quantum internet proof-of-concept
  • Long-Term (2040+)
  • Large-scale fault-tolerant quantum computing
  • Routine quantum simulation of complex systems
  • Quantum AI (if advantages materialize)
  • Global quantum internet
  • Applications we cannot yet imagine
  • Key uncertainty: All timelines depend on engineering breakthroughs (error correction scaling, qubit connectivity, manufacturing yield). Optimistic: 5-10 years to useful. Pessimistic: 20+ years. History suggests transformative technologies take longer than promised but arrive more suddenly than expected.
  • "Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future."-- Niels Bohr (attr.)
Slide 14

Key Takeaways

  • What Quantum Computing Is
  • Not faster classical computing
  • Fundamentally different paradigm
  • Exploits superposition, entanglement, interference
  • Exponential advantage for specific problems
  • Complements (not replaces) classical
  • Where We Are
  • NISQ era: noisy, limited qubits
  • Error correction threshold crossed
  • Cloud access democratizing research
  • Billions invested globally
  • Post-quantum crypto migration starting
  • What to Watch
  • Error correction scaling
  • First practical quantum advantage
  • Cryptographic implications (prepare now)
  • Drug discovery breakthroughs
  • Quantum internet development
Slide 15

Quantum Computing

  • End
  • Harnessing quantum mechanics to solve problems beyond classical reach -- the next computing revolution.
  • 30 slides • Technology • 2024
Remove this deck