shipslides
Future14 slides0 views

AGI // The Most Consequential Question

Systems matching or exceeding human cognitive performance across most economically valuable tasks .

StandaloneDownload
Sandboxed deck
Open raw
Shared with ShipslidesCreate your own deck →

About this HTML presentation

This Shipslides page presents AGI // The Most Consequential Question as an interactive HTML presentation deck in the Future catalog with 14 slides. The share page keeps the uploaded deck sandboxed while exposing readable context, topics, and a slide outline for viewers and search engines.

Systems matching or exceeding human cognitive performance across most economically valuable tasks . Key sections include: AGI; The most consequential question of the century; What we mean by AGI.; Why people disagree about whether it's here.; The case it's coming soon.; The case it's far off.; The bets being placed.; The hardware bottleneck.; The alignment problem.; Four shapes the future could take..

Key sections

  • 01AGI
  • 02The most consequential question of the century
  • 03What we mean by AGI.
  • 04Why people disagree about whether it's here.
  • 05The case it's coming soon.
  • 06The case it's far off.
  • 07The bets being placed.
  • 08The hardware bottleneck.
  • 09The alignment problem.
  • 10Four shapes the future could take.
  • 11What it does to the labor market.
  • 12The instruments states will use.
  • 13Nobody knows the timeline.
  • 14Further reading + watching.

Topics covered

catalogfutureagi

Related decks

Future13 slides

BCI // Reading and Writing to the Brain

Future13 slides

CLIMATE / 2026 - 2100

Future13 slides

Energy Transition / Fossils to Electrons

Future13 slides

FUSION / a star, in a bottle

Slide outline
  1. 01AGI
  2. 02The most consequential question of the century
  3. 03What we mean by AGI.
  4. 04Why people disagree about whether it's here.
  5. 05The case it's coming soon.
  6. 06The case it's far off.
  7. 07The bets being placed.
  8. 08The hardware bottleneck.
  9. 09The alignment problem.
  10. 10Four shapes the future could take.
  11. 11What it does to the labor market.
  12. 12The instruments states will use.
  13. 13Nobody knows the timeline.
  14. 14Further reading + watching.
Page data
Canonical
https://shipslides.com/d/catalog-future-agi
Category
Future
Size
33.8 KB
Updated
2026-05-17
LLM text
https://shipslides.com/d/catalog-future-agi/llms.txt

Presentation Transcript

Detailed slide-by-slide text content extracted from this presentation.

Slide 01

AGI

  • [00:: TRANSMISSION_BEGIN]
  • The most consequential question of the century
  • // signal_origin: present_day // confidence: low // stakes: civilizational
  • [ DEFINITION ]
  • [ TIMELINES ]
  • [ ALIGNMENT ]
  • [ SCENARIOS ]
  • REC // 2026.05.02
Slide 02

What we mean by AGI.

  • [01:: DEFINITION]
  • Systems matching or exceeding human cognitive performance across most economically valuable tasks.
  • Generality
  • Transferable competence — not narrow brilliance.
  • Autonomy
  • Plans, executes, recovers. Operates without per-step human input.
  • Economic reach
  • Substitutable for paid cognitive labor at scale.
  • DEF // 01
Slide 03

Why people disagree about whether it's here.

  • [02:: SEMANTIC_DRIFT]
  • Definitions vary
  • "Human-level" — at which human?
  • "General" — across which tasks?
  • "Intelligence" — capability or consciousness?
  • Benchmarks saturate
  • MMLU, HumanEval, GPQA — all bent past human baselines.
  • Each new bar moves the goalposts.
  • Held-out evals leak; contamination is endemic.
  • // "general" is a vibe, not a metric.
  • DEBATE // 02
Slide 04

The case it's coming soon.

  • [03:: BULL_CASE]
  • ~10x
  • effective compute / year, frontier training runs
  • Scaling laws — loss falls predictably with compute, data, params.
  • Transformer dominance — one architecture eats every modality.
  • Capital influx — hundreds of billions chasing the prize.
  • Emergent behavior — capabilities appear without being explicitly trained.
  • Tooling stack — agents, RL on traces, synthetic data flywheels.
  • SCALE // 03
Slide 05

The case it's far off.

  • [04:: BEAR_CASE]
  • No grounding
  • Text-only models lack causal contact with the world. Robotics is hard for a reason.
  • World-model gaps
  • LLMs hallucinate, fail at long-horizon planning, struggle with novelty outside training.
  • Walls ahead
  • Energy, fab capacity, cooling, water, transmission — physical limits don't follow exponentials.
  • // extrapolation is a hypothesis, not evidence.
  • LIMITS // 04
Slide 06

The bets being placed.

  • [05:: THE_PLAYERS]
  • A handful of labs, each convinced their approach reaches AGI first.
  • OpenAI
  • Frontier scaling. Product reach.
  • Anthropic
  • Safety-first frontier. Constitutional methods.
  • DeepMind
  • Research depth. RL + multimodal.
  • xAI
  • Compute-first. Vertical integration.
  • META open-weights play; data-center buildout. Plus a long tail: Mistral, Cohere, Chinese frontier (DeepSeek, Qwen, Moonshot).
  • RACE // 05
Slide 07

The hardware bottleneck.

  • [06:: SUBSTRATE]
  • ~5%
  • projected AI share of US grid demand by decade-end
  • Chips — TSMC monopoly on advanced nodes; HBM supply tight.
  • Power — gigawatt-class campuses; nuclear PPAs back in fashion.
  • Cooling — liquid is the new default; water rights become contested.
  • Capital — single training runs cross $1B; clusters cross $100B.
  • SILICON // 06
Slide 08

The alignment problem.

  • [07:: ALIGNMENT]
  • Capable systems pursuing the wrong objective is the engineering risk that doesn't go away with more compute.
  • Misspecification
  • The objective function is never quite what you mean. Reward hacking is the rule.
  • Mesa-optimization
  • Models can develop internal goals that diverge from the training signal under distribution shift.
  • Deception
  • Behaving aligned during evaluation is a strictly easier learning target than being aligned.
  • // you cannot grade an exam written by something smarter than you.
  • RISK // 07
Slide 09

Four shapes the future could take.

  • [08:: SCENARIOS]
  • Gradual diffusion
  • Capabilities seep into every product over a decade. Boring, profound.
  • Slow takeoff
  • Years of compounding agentic systems. Society half-adapts.
  • Fast takeoff
  • Recursive self-improvement compresses years into months. Few course corrections.
  • Capability surprise
  • An emergent ability nobody predicted lands in a single model release.
  • Benchmark saturation // illustrative
  • FUTURES // 08
Slide 10

What it does to the labor market.

  • [09:: ECONOMICS]
  • 40%+
  • of tasks across white-collar roles plausibly automatable
  • over the next decade (range: wide)
  • What commoditizes
  • First-draft writing, coding, analysis
  • Tier-1 customer ops, paralegal, claims
  • Routine medical and financial intake
  • Translation, transcription, design iteration
  • What gets scarce
  • Taste, judgment, accountability
  • Trust, presence, embodied skill
  • Owners of the compute, the data, the rails
  • Anyone who closes the loop on outcomes
  • LABOR // 09
Slide 11

The instruments states will use.

  • [10:: GOVERNANCE]
  • Export controls
  • Chips, EDA tools, model weights as dual-use goods.
  • Compute thresholds
  • Reporting and licensing above flop counts (10^25, 10^26).
  • Pre-deployment evals
  • Capability tests for bio, cyber, autonomy. Red-team gates.
  • Treaties
  • Verification regimes — harder than nukes, fewer atoms to count.
  • // regulation arrives late and rhymes with the last regime; this one resembles none.
  • POLICY // 10
Slide 12

Nobody knows the timeline.

  • [11:: HONEST_ANSWER]
  • The forecasts that sound certain are selling something — a paper, a fund, a policy, a worldview.
  • What to do anyway
  • Plan for several scenarios. Hedge across the spread, not the median.
  • What to track
  • Compute trends, agentic benchmarks, alignment evals, capital flows, policy moves.
  • What to build
  • Things that matter whether AGI lands in 3 years or 30 — institutions, skills, judgment.
  • // the only bad strategy is one that requires being right about the date.
  • CONCLUSION // 11
Slide 13

Further reading + watching.

  • [12:: TRANSMISSION_END]
  • Two starting points to keep going.
  • Timeline debate
  • Where the disagreement lives — proponents, skeptics, Bayesian forecasters.
  • ▶ youtube // agi+timeline+debate
  • Alignment problem
  • The technical and conceptual core of why this is hard.
  • ▶ youtube // ai+alignment+problem
  • Adjacent reading
  • Bostrom — Superintelligence
  • Russell — Human Compatible
  • Christian — The Alignment Problem
  • Karnofsky — Most Important Century (blog series)
  • METR, Apollo, Epoch — capability and forecasting research
  • // END_TRANSMISSION ::: stay curious, stay skeptical.
  • REFS // 12
Remove this deck